Mike and Gus discuss everything 2017! Resident Evil 7, Yakuza 0, Ni-Oh, For Honor, Berserk and the Band of the Hawk, Horizon: Zero Dawn, and of course the Nintendo Switch and Zelda: Breath of the Wild!
Mike and Gus discuss everything 2017! Resident Evil 7, Yakuza 0, Ni-Oh, For Honor, Berserk and the Band of the Hawk, Horizon: Zero Dawn, and of course the Nintendo Switch and Zelda: Breath of the Wild!
Been waiting a while for this game. Waited to see some reviews and see some actual word of mouth before buying this one today since, well, you know… emulating the Souls formula to a certain extent has to be a difficult thing to accomplish. Based on what I’ve played thus far, Nioh definitely takes a lot from the Souls formula but changes things up enough to stand on its own. The opening hour and a half that I played was quite strong, and I can’t wait to get to the rest.
Gus and I have already registered our opinions of the Switch on our podcast, but it’s time to break things down in print.
Now, obviously, Nintendo needed to reveal the Switch in a way that didn’t echo the unveiling of the Wii-U. I mean, let’s be honest… they didn’t do anything to help that console. They didn’t convey what it was, nor did they market the damn thing. But the Switch reveal was quite different. After all was said and done, we had a great understanding of what the console is, why it has the potential to benefit everyone, and most important of all, how it’s actually supposed to work. It was the necessary ‘un-Nintendo like move’ they so desperately needed, but unfortunately, the company left their stink all over the rest of their presentation.
At least they started strong. Right out of the gate, they told us what the Switch’s price point was and what its release date would be. Everyone was surprised to learn the console would be out on March 3rd, sooner than expected – media outlets a plenty had reported March 17th – but the price point, $299.99, was a little confusing. Without any context, I think $300 is reasonable, but that’s not the problem. The problem is that Nintendo probably aren’t selling the Switch at a loss, and they really should be.
You see, Nintendo like to pretend they’re not competing with Sony and Microsoft, but that’s poppycock. If you’re a gamer that has yet to enter this generation, and someone gives you $300 to spend on a new machine, you’re probably not buying a Switch. As of right now, Target’s website offers the Uncharted 4 PS4 bundle and the Battlefield 1 Xbox One S bundle for only $299. All of a sudden, the Switch’s ‘reasonable’ price point doesn’t seem so reasonable, especially since it doesn’t even come with a game. So yes, Nintendo, you ARE competing with Sony and Microsoft. To pretend otherwise is… well, pretty much what I expect out of you, you daft, clueless bastards. And let’s not forget, this holiday, the Switch will also be going head-to-head with the Xbox Scorpio.
So, there’s two things Nintendo should have done for the Switch, and keep in mind these are minimal moves.
First, they really should have included a pack-in game. 2 + 1 Switch seems to be a simple a tech demo; a smattering of mini-games which show off the system’s distance measuring IR sensor as well as the HD rumble feature. If this title was included with the Switch, people would have something fun to play with their friends right out of the box… which would have been a brilliant strategy if Nintendo had employed it. People would have been compelled to call their friends over to try 2 +1 Switch on the hybrid machine. This would have put the console in people’s hands in optimal settings, possibly causing these people to want a Switch of their own… but that’s a future not set to pass. Instead, Nintendo are charging $50 for their slate of demo experiences… and NOBODY is going to buy it. No, instead, everyone is going to buy Zelda and play the shit out of it for months… alone. Now, if anyone wants to get hands on with the Switch, they’ll probably have to try it at a Gamestop, which is probably the LEAST optimal setting I can think of.
Nintendo could have reduced the Switch’s price to $249.99. Would that put them at a loss per unit sold? Maybe, but consoles are often sold at a loss. Hardware distributors understand that selling at a loss usually leads to a faster growing install base. One day, their console will be easier and cheaper to produce, and that’s when they’ll be able to turn a healthy profit. In the meantime, they’ll make a little off software sales and accessories… or in Nintendo’s case, severely overpriced accessories. Cover the ears on your wallet, because this rundown is going to make it cry:
A Pro controller is $70. An additional dock – which is basically just a plastic case with HDMI passthrough – costs $80. A single Joycon controller – that’s just one SIDE – is $50… or, you can get a ‘discount’ if you buy two for $80. The Joycon straps are $8 a pop. The controller cradle for the Joycons – that is, a hunk of plastic with a tiny USB charge port – is $30.
Worst of all, Nintendo have finally joined the multiplayer paywall club. And that… that’s just terrible. But damn it, if you want to play Splatoon or Mario Kart 8 Deluxe online, they’ve got you by the cajones, don’t they? Now to be fair, I think everyone expected Nintendo would burrow down this rabbit hole one day… ‘because’, but that doesn’t make it any less of a disappointment. I mean, this was the only consumer friendly thing Nintendo had left… yet they just cast it into the wind like they couldn’t give less of a shit. And for those of you thinking there’s some other way they can justify their ‘service’, think again. They’re going to give you either an NES or SNES rom each month, and some of the latter will have multiplayer enabled.
“A rom? A bloody ROM?!”, you might ask.
Oh yes, a rom.
That’s what their ‘free game’ offerings will be… and at the end of each month, they’ll take them back… unless you want to buy them, of course. Know what that means? Nintendo doesn’t give a squatting shit how many times you’ve purchased games through their Virtual Consoles; they STILL want you to buy them again. The only positive thing I can say about this, at least for the time being, is that we have no idea how much Nintendo are planning to charge for their ‘service’. If they were smart, they’d make it way less than what Sony and Microsoft are charging… but nah. Still, the price of this thing is a big question, and they left it hanging in the air.
There were other questions they neglected to answer too, such as, “What’s the launch line-up going to be?” It wasn’t until the next day we had confirmation of five titles… and boy, did a lot of people express concern about that. I’ve lived through numerous console launches that had been worse, so I’m not going to complain. Besides, can you think of a better launch title than Zelda: Breath of the Wild?
“But it’s going to be on the Wii-U!”
So? Nintendo have only sold between 13 and 14 million units, so for the many that never bought a Wii-U, they won’t care about Zelda being cross-platform. The people who own a Wii-U won’t care either… you know, since they’re still getting the game.
Despite everything I’ve just shared, I know this may be hard to believe, but, Nintendo know EXACTLY what they’re doing. We may not like their approach, but every decision they’ve made has been steeped in money.
While casual consumers may look at this thing now and say, “There’s not enough that interests me,” Nintendo doesn’t care. They know there’s enough demand from fans to keep this thing selling throughout the entirety of 2017, and why? Because Zelda, Mario Kart, Splatoon and Super Mario Odyssey. You can argue nobody will care about a port (Mario Kart 8), nor a sequel that hasn’t differentiated itself enough from the original (Splatoon 2), but again, they have a large ‘didn’t previously own a Wii-U’ market to tap into as well.
But will the Switch sell as well as Nintendo and certain analysts believe?
Well, Nintendo apparently plan to have 10 million of these things produced by the end of 2017. Considering where the Wii-U is sitting, that’s an ambitious goal. However, there’s a lot of positivity buzzing around what this console can do, so I do expect this thing to outpace its predecessor every step of way. Certain analysts have guessed that after all is said and done, the Switch will have sold 40 million units.
To that, I say, “Not so fast.” I don’t think it’s impossible, but Nintendo need to stop being so wishy-washy.
What’s with all the ‘we’re going to continue to support the 3DS’ bullcrap? They come up with the brilliant idea to market a console that’s suitable for home AND on-the-go usage, and they want to keep its primary competitor on the shelf? I get that third parties love this machine because there’s 60 million units out there, but not putting the kibosh on the Nintendo 3DS in early 2017 is a mistake, and Nintendo will have to rectify that by this time next year if they hope to bring over the portable crowd.
And this ties directly into that whole ‘third party support’ thing.
Most Nintendo fans will say, “Nobody buys Nintendo hardware to play anything but Nintendo software!” But a 3DS fan has to be pretty short-sighted to actually believe such baloney. That system wouldn’t have moved 60 million units if not for third party support. If you believe otherwise, think of all the people that would recommend Monster Hunter, Ace Attorney, Dragon Quest, Etrian Odyssey, Shin Megami Tensei, Bravely Default, and so-on and so-forth. Beyond that, history shows there simply hasn’t been a successful console without a fair amount of third party support.
Thankfully, Nintendo has told us they’d like all third party games to appear on the Switch, but they shouldn’t hold their breath. They’ll continue to see remasters of popular games, but that’s about it. However, as long as the Switch keeps its momentum at retail, it shouldn’t be hard for Nintendo to convince third parties already on board with the 3DS to switch to… well, you know. But again, Nintendo can’t wait years for this transition to happen. It needs to be a year, tops, and then they have to commit to the Switch 100%. No ifs, ands or buts.
I’ve let Nintendo have it pretty good in this article, but it’s so you, the consumer, will be aware of what the current value of the system is for the average consumer (not great), how the first year and beyond is likely to pan out (better than the Wii-U… slow at first, perhaps hot afterwards), and what things Nintendo could have done if they were truly ‘in it to win it’. That said, I think the Switch is a pretty remarkable piece of hardware, and we could see a healthy balance of first party Nintendo games, as well as third party titles once those publishers are convinced to make their 3DS games for the Switch as well, or perhaps even exclusively, leaving the old portable behind.
Of course, success really is in the hands of Nintendo at this point. They need to deliver on games. No more of this ‘Metroid Space Ball Horseshit’. Nintendo always say they listen to their fans, and now is the time for them to deliver.
I had absolutely zero interest in playing this game. A first person Resident Evil? Pfft. Get out of here. To me, it just seemed like Capcom, who don’t really seem to know how to perform these days, were just trying to cash in on the P.T. demo craze.
Well, as I usually do after a game’s launch, I watched someone play the game for about 45 minutes… and to my surprise, it looked quite good. So, here it is! My first couple of hours with Resident Evil VII. Enjoy!
Mike and Gus discuss the Nintendo Switch reveal conference!
Mike and Gus discuss 2016 as a year overall and how it relates to the gaming industry’s semi-laziness, as well as how certain Youtubers have been representing us.
In preparation for the 2016 in review conversation we’ll be having on the podcast in about a week, I decided to write down a list of all the games I’ve played. Not just the games from this past year, mind you, but ALL of them. Didn’t matter if it’s a game from 2002 I was playing for the first time, or if it was an old favorite I was revisiting for the 18th time. Old games are just as much a part of our ‘gaming makeup’ each year as the new stuff we play, so here’s what I came up with:
Angry Video Game Nerd Adventures
Assassin’s Creed: Rogue
Far Cry 4
Batman: Akrham Knight
No Man’s Sky
Final Fantasy XV
Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare
Life Is Strange
The Witcher 3 (restarted)
Dark Souls 3
Forza Horizon 3
Gear of War 4
Dead Rising 4
Kirby: Planet Robobot
PvZ: Garden Warfare 2
Street Fighter V
Grim Dawn (official release date)
Lego Star Wars: The Force Awakens
Super Mario Run
Skyrim Special Edition
Dragon Quest VII
Earth Defense Force 4.1
Super Mario 3D Land
Grand Theft Auto Online
Grand Theft Auto 4
Super Mario 64
Mega Man 2
Mega Man 3
I obviously didn’t play all of these games from start to finish. Some I may have only played for a couple of hours. But even so, that’s one hell of a list, isn’t it? Great titles, alright ones, and even a few stinkers, but overall, I’d say 2016 was rather enjoyable. Still, this list presents a bit of a problem, namely the inadequacies of the gaming industry as a whole. Forty-three games, and you know what I noticed about them? Thirty-two are either sequels or stem iteratively from existing IP’s. Mmhmm. Thirty. Two. That’s insane. Even if we take older games off my list, we’re still talking close to 20.
Not that there’s anything inherently wrong with sequels or reboots. Doom makes a compelling argument for being my favorite game of the year. Hell, Dark Souls III is up there, too. Oh, and surprisingly, Gears of War 4 has proven to be quite memorable, as well. I also don’t care how many times Nintendo throws Mario at me, because he always amounts to a good time. Point is, I don’t personally mind when studios lean on formulas that’s proven to work them. No, it’s when they cross that line… when they insist on using that mindset as a crutch, that’s when I get worried.
And I’m worried now.
Gamers routinely say this is the best generation of gaming to date. Sure, they’ve conveniently overlooked the unnecessary iterative consoles and the sea of unfinished games that’s been released… but vidyagames, right?!
But seriously, I can’t deny there’s been some titles genuinely worth swooning over, but that’s not unique to the here and now. There have always been great video games, and there always will be.
But from a first party perspective, Sony and Microsoft have been playing things far too safe. They’ve relied once again on the likes of Killzone, Infamous, Gears of War, God of War, Forza, Halo, Ratchet and Clank, Little Big Planet, Uncharted, The Last of Us, and a handful of others. These are franchises that also defined the LAST generation of gaming, and while I understand the desire for studios to milk a cow’s supple teats until they’re coughing up powder, they’re leaving the PS4 and Xbox One without identities of their own.
The Xbox 360 was defined by Forza, Fable, and Gears of War. But what does the Xbox One have? Sunset Overdrive was largely overlooked, and Quantum Break was disappointing.
The Playstation 3 had Infamous, Uncharted and The Last of Us. But PS4? Well, it has Bloodborne… but that’s about it. Nobody cared about Knack, and while Until Dawn is great, it isn’t a title that’s going to sell systems. Driveclub has its fans, but still hasn’t managed to evade the stink left behind by its troubled launch. And it’s not even worth mentioning The Order: 1886 (I didn’t think it was terrible, but it’s certainly frowned upon by most of the gaming community).
So, if video games aren’t giving this generation a definitive voice, what is?
Well, the struggle over resolution and frame-rate, for one. But outside of that, this generation will likely be remembered for the releases of the PS4 Pro and Xbox Scorpio. I mean, their very existence could very well change the way consoles are developed and sold from here on out. I don’t have a crystal ball or anything, but I wouldn’t be surprised if we never saw a Playstation 5. If each console is only somewhat better than the version before it, a new naming convention could take over: Playstation Nitro, Playstation Beyond, Playstation Zen, etc. All only somewhat better than the previous iteration, and yet still years behind what PC hardware brings to the table.
And if I were Sony and Microsoft, I’d start thinking about how big a problem that might be.
This isn’t rocket science. GAMES should define how we feel about any given generation. Sure, we’ll also develop an attachment to hardware designs, but games are what matter most. Unfortunately, the gaming industry has lost sight of that, and that could very well bite console developers in the end. If Microsoft and Sony want to continue down the path of pushing consoles more than first party exclusives, they’ll eventually be perceived as third-party machines. If that happens, it leaves the door WIDE open for Steam machines to make another push, and with Steam having almost any third party title you can dream of, and for less money, that platform could finally become a contender in the living room.
And speaking of third-party, it’s pretty clear the AAA heavies have gotten lazy, too. They’re just too afraid to let go of moneymaking franchises. People often complain about being bored of the same old crap, but how do these companies respond?
“We’ll make our games look better. Cool?”
But people aren’t complaining about graphics anymore. That narrative just isn’t driving the industry as much as it used to… at least from the perspective of consumers. Gamers want better writing, character depth, enemy AI, etc. But nooooo… all anyone has done is say, “Better volumetric fog, god rays, and particle effects! That’ll revolutionize everything!”
Shadow of Mordor had the right idea with the Nemesis System. It was basic, yes, but I was convinced it was the first baby-step in this industry’s journey to develop better AI… and yet nobody has tried to emulate, let alone best that system since. Nope, every other game still features enemies that either stand against a single guard post, or walk in the same L-shaped pattern over and over.
So let me ask: Is this truly the best that AAA developers could pull off in 2016? Is this REALLY the best generation of gaming ever? I don’t think so, and furthermore, I think the industry CAN do better. Not only CAN it do better, but there’s nothing wrong with EXPECTING better, either. But with so many people literally buying products before they’re finalized, what incentive does this industry have to change its unfriendly business tactics?
Well, consumers have to realize that more powerful hardware isn’t going to solve a damn thing. If you want better quality products, you have to stop pre-ordering games. Stop telling studios you’re willing to buy their crap sight unseen. Also, if you’re not having much fun playing the games being released on the PS4 or Xbox One, playing them on a PS4 Pro or Xbox One S (or even the Xbox Scorpio) isn’t going to change that. Your gameplay will be enhanced, but enhancement of non-enjoyment is still just that… non-enjoyment.
If you want newer, better IP’s, and advancement in storytelling and AI, then all you need to do is keep those conversations in the public eye. Keep those narratives strong so AAA publishers and developers can see that they’re no longer going to get away with repackaging the same two or three gameplay formats time and time again. Make damn sure they know you want more than just: FPS – The Game / Blasting From Behind Cover – The Game / Stealthily Wipe-Out Poor Enemy AI – The Game / Detective Mode – The Game.
Not that AAA games should be villainized, though. Again, I still find them to be quite enjoyable. I’m just disappointed that the industry refuses to broaden its horizons in the ways that are most needed.
The good news? As long as you’re willing to wander outside the AAA scene, there’s plenty of great games being released by smaller and/or independent studios. Ori and the Blind Forest, The Witness, Inside, Limbo, Absolute Drift, Stardew Valley, Shovel Knight, Axiom Verge, Grow Home, Child of Light, Never Alone, Outlast, Trine, Braid, Undertale, Owlboy, Soma… and these are only some of the most notable choices. And hey, if none of these pique your curiosity, there’s still decades worth of games for you to go back and enjoy.
It’s easy to forget that gaming isn’t a ‘box’, but an art form that we can enjoy… well, pretty much whenever. Games take a bit longer to digest than music albums, movies, and even a number of books, and as a result, people always feel like they have to play the newest stuff and never look back on the old… and that’s just simply not true. If you find yourself in a rut, just look at your back catalog or start working on games that you may have missed. Sure, there are some titles that may not have aged as gracefully as others, but I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised to find that most hold their own quite well.